Analysis of allergy and hypersensitivity reactions to COVID-19 vaccines according to the EudraVigilance database (preprint)

Background: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented a new challenge in modern medicine. The development of vaccines was followed by massive population vaccinations. A few reports on post-vaccination allergic reactions have made patients and medical personnel uneasy as to anti-COVID-19 vaccines’ allergising potential. Most of the studies in this area to date have been small, and some that were based on global databases skipped most of the allergic diseases and concentrated only on anaphylaxis. We aimed to analyse the incidence of serious allergic reactions based on the EudraVigilance (EV) database, regardless of the reported symptoms and allergy mechanism. Methods: The total number of administrated vaccine doses was extracted on the 5th October 2023 from Vaccine Tracker and included all administrations since vaccinations began in the European Economic Area (EEA). Data on serious allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines was extracted from the EudraVigilance database with the same time point. The code names of 147 allergic symptoms or diseases were used. Results: The frequency of serious allergic reactions per 100,000 administered vaccine doses was 1.53 for Comirnaty, 2.16 for Spikevax, 88.6 for Vaxzevria, 2.11 for Janssen, 7.9 for Novavax, 13.3 for VidPrevtyn Beta and 3.1 for Valneva. The most prevalent reported reactions were oedema (0.46) and anaphylaxis (0.40). Only 6% of these reactions were delayed hypersensitivity-oriented. Conclusions: The overall frequency of potential serious allergic reactions to COVID-19 is very rare. Therefore, COVID-19 vaccines seem to be safe for human use. The lowest frequency of allergic reaction was observed for Comirnaty and the highest for Vaxzevria.

Clusters of post-acute COVID-19 symptoms: a latent class analysis across 9 databases and 7 countries (preprint)

Prior evidence has suggested the multisystem symptomatic manifestations of post-acute COVID-19 condition (PCC). Here we conducted a network cluster analysis of 24 WHO proposed symptoms to identify potential latent subclasses of PCC. Individuals with a positive test of or diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 after 09/2020 and with at least one symptom within ≥ 90 to 365 days following infection were included. Sub-analyses were conducted among people with ≥ 3 different symptoms. Summary characteristics were provided for each cluster. All analyses were conducted separately in 9 databases from 7 countries, including data from primary care, hospitals, national health claims and national health registries, allowing to validate clusters across the different healthcare settings. 787,078 persons with PCC were included. Single-symptom clusters were common across all databases, particularly for joint pain, anxiety, depression and allergy. Complex clusters included anxiety-depression and abdominal-gastrointestinal symptoms. Substantial heterogeneity within and between PCC clusters was seen across healthcare settings. Current definitions of PCC should be critically reviewed to reflect this variety in clinical presentation.

Contacts with environmental biodiversity affect human health: links to allergies, physical and mental health revealed during the initial waves of the COVID-19 pandemic (preprint)

The gradual decrease in the prevalence of serious infectious diseases over the last century has been followed by increase in so called “modern” diseases, including allergies, chronic inflammatory conditions, psychiatric, and metabolic disorders. Between 2019 and 2022, public awareness of the threat of infectious diseases in humans was renewed by the global pandemic of a new type of a coronavirus, the SARS-COV-2. This public interest opened improved possibilities to test hypotheses on the factors associated with inter-individual variation in susceptibility to infectious and “modern” diseases. Based on the Hygiene hypothesis and Biodiversity hypothesis, we predicted that contacts with natural environment and wildlife in childhood and/or in adulthood can improve general health and decrease the risks of severe COVID-19 progression or prevalence of the “modern” diseases, namely the allergies. Here we report the results of an online, self-evaluating questionnaire survey conducted in the Czech Republic, where we contrasted selected health issues, and linked them to the living environment, including the level of contacts with biodiversity. In a sample of 1188 respondents, we revealed a significant effect of time spent in nature and contacts with biodiversity on physical and mental health, and incidence of allergies. This is unlike the COVID-19 progression, which was related to age, physical health, smoking, allergies, and interaction of age with smoking, but not to contacts with the natural environmental diversity. Our findings are in agreement with the Biodiversity hypothesis of allergy and, linking human and environmental health, they urge for One Health approach application.

Polyethylene glycol hypersensitivity, patient outcomes in a seven year retrospective study. (preprint)

Background: Immediate IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to polyethylene glycol (PEG) are rare. Our understanding of PEG hypersensitivity reactions is limited. We evaluate the clinical characteristics and investigation outcomes of the largest cohort of PEG allergic patients reported so far. Method: 44 patients investigated for suspected PEG allergy across four UK tertiary allergy centres between October 2013 and December 2020 were studied. Clinical characteristics, details of index reaction, and approaches to and outcomes of allergy investigations were analysed. Results: PEG hypersensitivity was confirmed in 42 of 44 cases. Macrogol laxatives were the most common index drugs reported (23%), followed by depo-medroxyprogesterone (19%), oral penicillin V (10%), and depo-methylprednisolone (10%). 61% experienced grade III anaphylaxis. Intradermal testing (IDT) increased the diagnostic sensitivity from 51% to 85%. Five patients experienced systemic reactions during IDT. Of the five patients, two were skin prick test (SPT)-positive to a high molecular weight (MW) PEG. Seven PEG-allergic patients reported tolerance to H1 antihistamines containing PEG. Administration of mRNA COVID-19 (n=5) or AZ COVID-19 vaccines (n=14) was tolerated in 16 patients. Conclusion: PEG hypersensitivity is an uncommon cause of drug-induced anaphylaxis. Four index drugs accounted for two-thirds of cases and reactions to these drugs should prompt PEG hypersensitivity investigations. PEG IDT increases diagnostic yield. The role of SPT with higher MW PEGs requires further attention. We observed no correlation in PEG dose and concentration between the implicated and tolerated PEG-containing drugs. Further studies are required to understand PEG thresholds and PEG equivalent doses of various administration routes. COVID-19 vaccines were tolerated by all exposed.

Risk factors of immunisation stress-related response to COVID-19 vaccination and history of allergy as a newly identified risk factor (preprint)

Abstract Background Safe vaccination worldwide is critical for eliminating the COVID-19 pandemic elimination. We aimed to evaluate adverse reactions to vaccination using a web-based questionnaire and to examine the risk factors for the occurrence of immunisation stress-related response (ISRR). Methods We conducted a questionnaire survey using Google Form® among employees of St. Marianna University Hospital who had received the COVID-19 vaccine between April 2021 and May 2021, 1 week after the first and second vaccinations. We developed and used a questionnaire to identify individuals with ISRR, according to the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria. A generalised linear mixed model was constructed with ISRR onset as the dependent variable, subjects as the random factor, and each parameter as a fixed factor. A multivariate model was constructed using the forced imputation method with factors that were significant in the univariate analysis. Results We enrolled 2,073 and 1,856 respondents in the first and second questionnaire surveys, respectively. Fifty-five and 33 ISRR cases were identified in the first and second vaccinations, respectively. In the univariate analysis, strong pre-vaccination anxiety (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30–4.12, p=0·004) and history of allergy (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.14–2.24, p=0·007) were significant risk factors. Multivariate analysis also showed that strong pre-vaccination anxiety (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.15–3.80, p=0.016) and history of allergy (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.09–2.15, p=0.014) were significant risk factors. Conclusions Confirmation of allergy prior to vaccination and subsequent action are essential for addressing ISRR.

Allergic reactions to the Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine in South Africa (preprint)

Abstract ( n=254/250 words)   Background: The Janssen-Ad26.COV2.S vaccine is authorised for use in several countries with more than 30 million doses administered. Mild and severe allergic adverse events following immunisation(AEFI) have been reported. The aim of this report is to detail allergic reactions reported during the Sisonke phase 3B study in South Africa. Methods: : A single-dose of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine was administered to 477234 South African Healthcare Workers between 17 February and 17 May 2021. Monitoring of adverse events used a combination of passive reporting and active case finding. Telephonic contact was attempted for all adverse events reported as “allergy”. Anaphylaxis adjudication was performed using the Brighton Collaboration (BCC) and NIAID case definitions.  Results: : A large cohort of South African healthcare workers received the Ad26.COV2.S vaccination. Only 250(0.052%) patients reported any allergic-type reaction(less than 1 in 2000), with four cases of adjudicated anaphylaxis (BCC level 1, n=3)(prevalence of 8.4 per million doses). All anaphylaxis cases had a prior history of drug or vaccine-associated anaphylaxis. Cutaneous allergic reactions were the commonest non-anaphylatic reactions and included: self-limiting, transient/localised rashes requiring no healthcare contact(n=91); or isolated urticaria and/or angioedema[n=70 median  onset 48(IQR 11.5-120) hours post vaccination] that necessitated healthcare contact(81%), antihistamine(63%), and/or systemic/topical corticosteroid(16%). All immediate (including adjudicated anaphylaxis) and the majority of delayed AEFI(65/69) cases resolved completely.   Conclusions: : Allergic AEFI are rare following a single-dose of Ad26.COV with complete resolution in  all cases of anaphylaxis. Though rare, isolated, delayed onset urticaria and/or angioedema was the commonest allergic AEFI requiring treatment, with nearly half occurring in participants without known atopic disease.   Keywords: allergic reaction, anaphylaxis, COVID19 adenovirus vaccine; Janssen-Ad26.COV2.S vaccine, urticaria

Remotely provided open-label placebo reduces frequency of and impairment by allergic symptoms (preprint)

Background: Placebos being prescribed with full honesty and disclosure (i.e., open-label placebo = OLP) have been shown to reduce symptom burden in a variety of conditions. With regard to allergic rhinits, previous research provided inconclusive evidence for the effects of OLP, possibly related to a separate focus on either symptom severity or symptom frequency. Overcoming this limitation of previous research, the present study aimed to examine the effects of OLP on both the severity and frequency of allergic symptoms. Methods: In a randomized-controlled trial, patients with allergic rhinits ( N =74) were randomized to OLP or treatment as usual (TAU). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, OLP was administered remotely in a virtual clinical encounter. Participants took placebo tablets for 14 days. The primary outcomes were the severity and frequency of allergic symptoms. The secondary endpoint was allergy-related impairment. Results: OLP did not significantly improve symptom severity over TAU, F (1, 71) = 3.280, p = .074, ɳ² = .044, but did reduce symptom frequency, F (1, 71) = 7.272, p = .009, ɳ² = .093, and allergy-related impairment more than TAU, F (1, 71) = 6.445, p = .013, ɳ² = .083, reflecting medium to large effects. The use of other anti-allergic medication did not influence the results. Conclusions: While OLP was able to lower the frequency of allergic symptoms and allergy-related impairment substantially, its effects on symptom severity were weaker. The remote provision of OLP suggests that physical contact between patients and providers might not be necessary for OLP to work.

Immune Correlates of Hyperglycemia and Vaccination in a Non-human Primate Model of Long-COVID (preprint)

Hyperglycemia, and exacerbation of pre-existing deficits in glucose metabolism, are major manifestations of the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC). Our understanding of lasting glucometabolic disruptions after acute COVID-19 remains unclear due to the lack of animal models for metabolic PASC. Here, we report a non-human primate model of metabolic PASC using SARS-CoV-2 infected African green monkeys (AGMs). Using this model, we have identified a dysregulated chemokine signature and hypersensitive T cell population during acute COVID-19 that correlates with elevated and persistent hyperglycemia four months post-infection. This persistent hyperglycemia correlates with elevated hepatic glycogen, but there was no evidence of long-term SARS-CoV-2 replication in the liver and pancreas. Finally, we report a favorable glycemic effect of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine, administered on day 4 post-infection. Together, these data suggest that the AGM metabolic PASC model exhibits important similarities to human metabolic PASC and can be utilized to assess therapeutic candidates to combat this syndrome.

Safety and immunogenicity of SW-BIC-213, a modified COVID-19 Lipo-Polyplex mRNA vaccine, in Laotian healthy adults aged 18 years and above: a Phase 1/2 trial (preprint)

Background The mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in protecting against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), including providing high protection against severe disease during the emergence of variant waves. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and immunogenicity of a 2-dose regimen of the LPP-based mRNA vaccine, SW-BIC-213, in Laos. Methods For this phase 1/2 clinical trial, we recruited healthy adults aged 18-60 years (phase 1) or [≥]18 years (phase 2) from Mahosot Hospital (Vientiane) and Champhone District Hospital (Savannakhet). Participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection, previous COVID-19 vaccination, known allergies to any vaccine component, or pregnancy were excluded. In the phase 1 trial, 41 eligible participants were sequentially assigned to either the 25 g dose group (25 g) or the 45 g dose group (45 g) in accordance with their enrollment order, with 21 participants in 45 g dose group and 20 participants in 25 g dose group. In the phase 2 trial, 480 participants were randomly allocated (2:2:1 ratio) to either the 25 g dose group, 45 g dose group, or placebo group. The primary endpoints for the phase 1 trial were the incidence of local/systemic solicited adverse reactions/events (0-6 days after each vaccination dose), unsolicited adverse events (0-21 days and 0-28 days after the first and second dose of immunization, respectively), and serious adverse events from the first dose of vaccination to 28 days after completing the full course of immunization. In the phase 2 trial, the primary endpoints were the seroconversion rate and geometric mean titer (GMT) of SARS-CoV-2 S-protein specific IgG antibodies and neutralizing antibodies 14 days after the second dose in participants. As for neutralizing antibodies, we detected pseudo-virus neutralizing antibody against wild type (WT), Delta, BA.1 and BA.2. We also detected live viral neutralizing antibody against WT strain 14 days after the second dose. Furthermore, the safety endpoints were also measured during the trial. This seamless phase 1/2 trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05144139. Results Between December 3, 2021, and March 31, 2022, a total of 41 participants were recruited in the phase 1 trial, while the phase 2 trial enrolled 480 participants from January 20 to July 6, 2022. In the phase 1 trial, a total of 32 subjects (80.0%) reported 103 cases of adverse reactions. All adverse reactions were limited to Grade 1-2. In the phase 2 trial, a total of 479 subjects, 372 subjects (77.7%) reported 929 cases of adverse reactions. All adverse reactions in severity of Grade 3 were manifested as fever (3.4%, 2.1% and 2.9% in 45 g dose, 25 g dose and placebo group respectively, only observed in adults), except which all other reactions were limited to Grade 1-2. All adverse reactions noted during the study were tolerable, predominantly transient, and resolved spontaneously. No serious adverse events (SAEs) related to vaccination were observed. In Phase 2 study, SW-BIC-213 could elicit a high level of seroconversion rate of pseudo-virus neutralizing antibody against WT (100.0% in 25 g dose group, 99.3% in 45 g dose group), Delta (99.2% in 25 g dose group, 98.0% in 45 g dose group), Omicron BA.1 (84.1% in 25 g dose group, 84.7% in 45 g dose group) and Omicron BA.2 (96.0% in 25 g dose group, 88.8% in 45 g dose group) at 14 days after the second dose. The pseudo-virus neutralizing antibody titer against WT, Delta, BA.1 and BA.2 was all significant higher (P<0.0001) in both 45 g dose group (1175.02, 620.62, 72.39 and 172.80) and 25 g dose group (885.80, 579.40, 47.24 and 101.96) compared with the placebo group (9.67, 10.66, 13.99 and 29.53) at 14 days after the second dose. As for live viral neutralizing antibodies against WT strain, the seroconversion rate could reach more than 94% at 14 days after second dose. The neutralizing antibody titer against WT strain was significantly higher (P<0.0001) in both 45 g dose group (315.00) and 25 g dose group (323.18) compared with the placebo group (8.51) at 14 days after second dose. Conclusion: COVID-19 mRNA vaccine SW-BIC-213 manifests a favorable safety profile and is highly immunogenic in eligible subjects aged [≥]18 years.

CLINICAL AND SEROLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF POST COVID-19 CONDITION: FINDINGS FROM A CANADIAN PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY (preprint)

Introduction: More than three years into the pandemic, there is persisting uncertainty as to the etiology, biomarkers, and risk factors of Post COVID-19 Condition (PCC). Serological research data remain a largely untapped resource. Few studies have investigated the potential relationships between post-acute serology and PCC, while accounting for clinical covariates. Methods: We compared clinical and serological predictors among COVID-19 survivors with (n=102 cases) and without (n=122 controls) persistent symptoms [≥] 12 weeks post-infection. We selected four primary serological predictors (anti-nucleocapsid (N), anti-Spike, and anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG titres, and neutralization efficiency), and specified clinical covariates a priori. Results: Similar proportions of PCC-cases (66.7%, n=68) and infected-controls (71.3%, n=87) tested positive for anti-N IgG. More cases tested positive for anti-Spike (94.1%, n=96) and anti-RBD (95.1%, n=97) IgG, as compared with controls (anti-Spike: 89.3%, n=109; anti-RBD: 84.4%, n=103). Similar trends were observed among unvaccinated participants. Effects of IgG titres on PCC status were non-significant in univariate and multivariate analyses. Adjusting for age and sex, PCC-cases were more likely to be efficient neutralizers (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.11 - 4.49), and odds was further increased among cases to report deterioration in quality of life (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.64 - 7.31). Clinical covariates found to be significantly related to PCC included obesity (OR 2.3, p=0.02), number of months post COVID-19 (OR 1.1, p<0.01), allergies (OR 1.8, p=0.04), and need for medical support (OR 4.1, p<0.01). Conclusion: Despite past COVID-19 infection, approximately one third of PCC-cases and infected-controls were seronegative for anti-N IgG. Findings suggest higher neutralization efficiency among cases as compared with controls, and that this relationship is stronger among cases with more severe PCC. Cases also required more medical support for COVID-19 symptoms, and described complex, ongoing health sequelae. More data from larger cohorts are needed to substantiate results, permit subgroup analyses of IgG titres, and explore for differences between clusters of PCC symptoms. Future assessment of IgG subtypes may also elucidate new findings.

Value of the Lymphocyte Transformation Test for the Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions in Severe Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients (preprint)

In the first wave of COVID-19, up to 20% of patients had skin lesions with variable characteristics. There is no clear evidence of the involvement of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in all the cases; some of these lesions may be secondary to drug hypersensitivity. To analyze the possible cause of the skin lesions, we performed a complete allergology study on 11 patients. One year after recovery from COVID-19, we performed a lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) and Th1/Th2 cytokine secretion assays of PBMC. We included 5 nonallergic patients treated with the same drugs without lesions. Except for one patient who had an immediate reaction to azithromycin, all patients had a positive LTT to at least one of the drugs tested (azithromycin, clavulanic acid, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir, and ritonavir). None of the nonallergic patients had a positive LTT. We found mixed Th1/Th2 cytokine secretion (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IFN-γ) in patients with skin lesions corresponding to mixed drug hypersensitivity type IVa and IVb. In all cases, we identified a candidate drug as the culprit for skin lesions during SARS-CoV-2 infection, although only three patients had a positive drug challenge. Therefore, it would be reasonable to recommend avoiding the drug in question in all cases.

Trends and Patterns in Electronic Health Record (EHR) Research (1991-2022): A Bibliometric Analysis of Australian Literature (preprint)

Introduction: Electronic Heath Records (EHRs) play a vital role in facilitating streamlined service provision and governance across the Australian health system. In light of the recent challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic, an ageing population, health workforce silos and growing inefficiencies in traditional systems, a detailed historical analysis of the use of EHRs research in Australia is timely. The aim of this study is to examine the trends and patterns in EHR research in Australia over the last three decades utilising bibliometrics.  Methods: Data for the bibliometric analysis was sourced from Web of Science Core Collection. The search strategy identified articles on EHR research in Australia between 1991 and 2022. Key fields included were author(s), affiliation, year of publication, source, author’s keywords, and citations. R and R Studio was used to conduct the analysis, using bibliometrix library and biblioshiny interface.  Results: A total of 951 articles, published in 443 sources were included in the bibliometric analysis.  Original research articles made up the vast majority of the publications (n=837; 88.0%). The annual growth rate of EHR research in Australia was about 17.1%. Since 2022, the main trend topics in EHR research were COVID-19, opioid usage, and natural language processing. Thematic analysis indicated aged care, clinical decision support systems, cardiovascular disease, drug allergy and adverse drug reaction as the ‘hot’ themes in EHR research in Australia. Rehabilitation, ambulance/emergency services and monitoring were niche areas of research.  Conclusion: The study shows a significant uptrend in EHR related research in Australia. The emerging intellectual and collaborative structure of this inter-disciplinary field provides a reference point for academics involved in this field of research. Data also provides guidance for policy makers and funding institutions in terms of the most significant contributions and key fields of research. The implication of the research could also be interesting for the public information and general knowledge of the community.

Carotid body dysregulation contributes to the enigma of long COVID (preprint)

The symptoms of long COVID, which include fatigue, breathlessness, dysregulated breathing, and exercise intolerance, have unknown mechanisms. These symptoms are also observed in heart failure and are partially driven by increased sensitivity of the carotid chemoreflex. As the carotid body has an abundance of ACE2 (the cell entry mechanism for SARS-CoV-2), we investigated whether carotid chemoreflex sensitivity was elevated in participants with long COVID. During cardiopulmonary exercise testing, the VE/VCO2 slope (a measure of breathing efficiency) was higher in the long COVID group than in the controls, indicating excessive hyperventilation. The hypoxic ventilatory response, which measures carotid chemoreflex sensitivity, was increased in long COVID participants and correlated with the VE/VCO2 slope, suggesting that excessive hyperventilation may be related to carotid body hypersensitivity. Therefore, the carotid chemoreflex is sensitized in long COVID and may explain dysregulated breathing and exercise intolerance in these participants. Tempering carotid body excitability may be a viable treatment option for long COVID patients.

The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine Comirnaty induces anaphylactic shock in an anti-PEG hyperimmune large animal model: Role of complement in cardiovascular, hematological, and inflammatory mediator changes (preprint)

Background: Comirnaty, Pfizer-BioNTech's polyethylene-glycol (PEG)-containing Covid-19 vaccine, can cause hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) in a small fraction of immunized people which can, very rarely, culminate in life-threatening anaphylaxis. A role of anti-PEG antibodies (Abs) has been proposed, but causality has not yet been proven in an animal model. This study aimed to provide such evidence using anti-PEG hyperimmune pigs (i.e., pigs displaying very high levels of anti-PEG Abs). We also sought to find evidence for the role of complement (C) activation and thromboxane A2 (TXA2) release in blood as contributing effects to anaphylaxis. Methods: Pigs (n=6) were immunized with 0.1 mg/kg PEGylated liposome (Doxebo) i.v. the rise of anti-PEG IgG and IgM was measured in serial blood samples with ELISA. After 2-3 weeks, during the height of seroconversion, the animals were injected i.v. with 1/3 human vaccine dose (HVD) of Comirnaty, and the hemodynamic (PAP, SAP), cardiopulmonary (HR, EtCO2,), hematological parameters (WBC, granulocyte, lymphocyte, and platelet counts) and blood immune mediators (anti-PEG IgM and IgG Abs, C3a and TXA2) were measured as endpoints of HSRs. Results: A week after immunization of 6 pigs with Doxebo, the level of anti-PEG IgM and IgG rose 5-10-thousands-fold in all animals, and they all developed anaphylactic shock to i.v. injection of 1/3 HVD of Comirnaty. The reaction, starting within 1 min, led to the abrupt decline of SAP along with maximal pulmonary hypertension, decreased pulse pressure amplitude, tachycardia, granulo- and thrombocytopenia, and paralleling rises of plasma C3a and TXB2 levels. These vaccine effects were not observed in non-immunized pigs. Conclusions: Consistent with previous studies with PEGylated nano-liposomes, these data show a causal role of anti-PEG Abs in the anaphylaxis to Comirnaty. The reaction involves C activation, and, hence, it represents C activation-related pseudo-allergy (CARPA). The setup provides the first large-animal model for mRNA-vaccine-induced anaphylaxis in humans.

Is PEGylation of Drugs Associated with Hypersensitivity Reactions? An Analysis of the Italian National Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting System.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Evidence highlights the allergenic potential of PEGylated drugs because of the production of anti-polyethylene glycol immunoglobulins. We investigated the risk of hypersensitivity reactions of PEGylated drugs using the Italian spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting system database. METHODS: We selected adverse drug reaction reports attributed to medicinal products containing PEGylated active substances and/or PEGylated liposomes from the Italian Spontaneous Reporting System in the period between its inception and March 2021. As comparators, we extracted adverse drug reaction reports of medicinal products containing the same non-PEGylated active substances and/or non-PEGylated liposomes (or compounds belonging to the same mechanistic class). A descriptive analysis of reports of hypersensitivity reactions was performed. Reporting rates and time to onset of hypersensitivity reactions were also calculated in the period between January 2009 and March 2021. As a measure of disproportionality, we calculated the reporting odds ratio. RESULTS: Overall, 3865 adverse drug reaction reports were related to PEGylated medicinal products and 11,961 to their non-PEGylated comparators. Around two-thirds of patients were female and reports mostly concerned patients aged between 46 and 64 years. The frequency of hypersensitivity reactions reporting was higher among PEGylated versus non-PEGylated medicinal products (11.7% vs 9.4%, p < 0.0001). The hypersensitivity reaction reporting rates were higher for PEGylated medicinal products versus non-PEGylated medicinal products, with reporting rate ratios that ranged from 1.4 (95% confidence interval 0.8-2.5) for pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim to 20.0 (95% confidence interval 2.8-143.5) for peginterferon alpha-2a versus interferon alpha-2a. The median time to onset of hypersensitivity reactions was 10 days (interquartile range: 0-61) for PEGylated medicinal products, and 36 days (interquartile range: 3-216) for non-PEGylated comparators. Statistically significant reporting odds ratios were observed when comparing the reporting of hypersensitivity reactions for PEGylated versus non-PEGylated medicinal products (reporting odds ratio: 1.3; 95% confidence interval 1.1-1.4). However, when using all other drugs as comparators, the disproportionality analysis showed no association with hypersensitivity reactions for PEGylated nor non-PEGylated medicinal products, thus suggesting that many other triggers of drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions play a major role. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this analysis of the Italian spontaneous adverse drug reaction database suggest a potential involvement for PEGylation in triggering drug-related hypersensitivity reactions, especially clinically relevant reactions. However, when comparing both PEGylated and non-PEGylated drugs under study to all other drugs no disproportionate reporting of hypersensitivity reactions was observed, probably due to a masking effect owing to the presence in the same database of other medicinal products increasing the threshold required to highlight a safety signal when the entire database is used as a reference.

Evaluation of association of anti-PEG antibodies with anaphylaxis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (preprint)

Background: The mechanism for anaphylaxis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination has been widely debated; understanding this serious adverse event is important for future vaccines of similar design. A mechanism proposed is type I hypersensitivity (i.e., IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation) to excipient polyethylene glycol (PEG). Using an assay that, uniquely, had been previously assessed in patients with anaphylaxis to PEG, our objective was to compare anti-PEG IgE in serum from mRNA COVID-19 vaccine anaphylaxis case-patients and persons vaccinated without allergic reactions. Secondarily, we compared anti-PEG IgG and IgM to assess alternative mechanisms. Methods: Selected anaphylaxis case-patients reported to U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System December 14, 2020 - March 25, 2021 were invited to provide a serum sample. mRNA COVID-19 vaccine study participants with residual serum and no allergic reaction post-vaccination ("controls") were frequency matched to cases 3:1 on vaccine and dose number, sex and 10-year age category. Anti-PEG IgE was measured using a dual cytometric bead assay. Anti-PEG IgG and IgM were measured using two different assays. Laboratorians were blinded to case/control status. Results: All 20 case-patients were women; 17 had anaphylaxis after dose 1, 3 after dose 2. Thirteen (65%) were hospitalized and 7 (35%) were intubated. Time from vaccination to serum collection was longer for case-patients vs controls (post-dose 1: median 105 vs 21 days). Among Moderna recipients, anti-PEG IgE was detected in 1 of 10 (10%) case-patients vs 8 of 30 (27%) controls (p=0.40); among Pfizer-BioNTech recipients, it was detected in 0 of 10 case-patients (0%) vs 1 of 30 (3%) controls (p>0.99). Anti-PEG IgE quantitative signals followed this same pattern. Neither anti-PEG IgG nor IgM was associated with case status with both assay formats. Conclusion: Our results support that anti-PEG IgE is not a predominant mechanism for anaphylaxis post-mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.

The impact of COVID-19 prevention and control policy adjustment on anxiety, depression and coping behavior in China: a Cross-sectional Online Survey, 21-28 December, 2022 (preprint)

Background Following external situation reports, individuals perceive risks, experience different emotional reactions, and further change their behaviors. Therefor people's psychological state will also be affected by the change after the adjustment of COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control policy, and it remains unknown what kind of coping behaviors will be produced due to emotional reactions. This study focuses on assessing the prevalence of negative emotions in the Chinese population after policy adjustments and explores how negative emotions affect people's coping behaviors.Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted during 21–28 December 2022, included sociodemographic characteristics, COVID-19 infection and irrational purchase behavior, psychological assessment, and opinion polling. Depression and anxiety status are assessed by PHQ-9 and GAD-7, Coping behavior is defined as " medical behavior and irrational consumption behavior after the adjustment of COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control policy in China". The relationship between anxiety, depression and coping behavior was analyzed by Pearson χ2 test, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression.Results A total of 3995 participants who reported infection with COVID-19 were included in this study, of which 2363 (59.1%) and 1194 (29.9%) had symptoms of depression and anxiety, respectively. According to the results of the Pearson χ2 test, there was a significant difference in clinical treatment (such as self- medication, seeking professional treatment, using online services of medical institutions) and irrational purchase behavior (such as large-scale purchases of medicines, masks) between different level of depression and anxiety. Logistic regression results show that depression was a risk factor for self- medication (OR = 1.254, 95%CI: 1.124 ~ 1.399), seeking professional treatment (OR = 1.215, 95%CI: 1.017 ~ 1.451), using online services of medical institutions (OR = 1.320, 95%CI: 1.159 ~ 1.503), large-scale purchases of medicines (OR = 1.154, 95%CI: 1.083 ~ 1.230) and masks (OR = 1.096, 95%CI: 1.005 ~ 1.196). Anxiety was a risk factor for seeking professional treatment(OR = 1.285, 95%CI: 1.009 ~ 1.636) and large-scale purchases of masks (OR = 1.168, 95%CI: 1.028 ~ 1.327).Conclusion Affected by depression, COVID-19 patients are more likely to have medical behaviors such as self- medication, seeking professional treatment, and using online services of medical institutions, which may also trigger their storage behaviors of medicines and masks; on the other hand, anxiety will trigger the coping behavior of patients to seek professional treatment and store masks in large quantities. Attention should be paid to expand mental health screening and guidance in community health institutions, and to carry out COVID-19 health education for depressed or anxious people, in order to reduce adverse drug reactions, avoid panic seeking professional treatment and irrational purchase behavior, and protect the mental health of the public.Trial registration: This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Capital Medical University (2023SY086), and informed consent was obtained from the study subjects before the investigation.

A case report of laryngeal edema caused by COVID-19 (preprint)

Background Laryngeal edema is caused by the exudation of submucosal tissue fluid from the laxity of the pharynx and can lead to obstruction of the upper airway. It is commonly caused by post-extubation, drug allergy, and bacterial infection. During the current COVID-19 pandemic situation, laryngeal edema is a relatively rare but fatal complication of COVID-19. Taking measures to prevent laryngeal edema can reduce the incidence of sudden life-threatening events in the course of treatment.Case presentation: Here, we report a case in a Chinese male with COVID-19 complicated with laryngeal edema. The initial diagnosis of COVID-19 was followed by a sudden onset of inspiratory dyspnea during hospitalization. At the time of tracheal intubation, laryngeal edema was seen, and a positive bacterial culture suggested a secondary bacterial infection.Conclusion We report a rare case of laryngeal edema complicated by COVID-19. The patient recovered after prompt intubation and treatment. Close monitoring of patients' inflammation indicators and auxiliary bacterial monitoring can effectively prevent the occurrence of laryngeal edema caused by COVID-19.